You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 1 Basic characteristics of included studies

From: Efficacy and safety of atropine to control myopia progression: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Source Country/Area Follow- up, M Included Atropine Dose, % Age, Year Baseline Refraction, Diopter (Mean ± SD) Experimental group Control group Total No. of Patients (test group/control group)
Chua et al., 2005 [10] Singapore 12 1 6–12 −3.58 ± 1.17 1% Atropine placebo 156/190
Hsiao et al., 2005 [11] Taiwan 18 0.5 <18 −3.26 ± 0.15 0.5%Atropine+Multi-focal Multi-focal lenses 66/61
Kumaran et al., 2015 [12] Singapore 36 1 6–12 −3.36 1% Atropine placebo 147/166
Polling et al., 2016 [13] Europeans 12 0.5 <18 −6.6 ± 3.3 0.5% Atropine placebo 60/17
Shih et al., 2001 [14] Taiwan 18 0.5 6–13 −3.28 ± 0.13 0.5%Atropine+multi-focal multi-focal glasses 66/61
Shin et al., 1999 [15] Taiwan 12 0.5 6–13 −4.89 ± 2.06 0.5,0.25,0.1% Atropine placebo 41/49
Wang et al., 2017 [16] China 12 0.5 5–10 −1.3 ± 0.4 0.5% Atropine placebo 63/63
Yam et al., 2018 [17] China 12 0.05 4–12 −3.98 ± 1.69 0.05,0.025,0.01% Atropine placebo 110/111
YEN et al., 1989 [18] Taiwan 12 1 6–14 −1.523 ± 0.960 1% Atropine placebo 32/32
Yi et al., 2015 [19] China 12 1 7–12 −1.23 ± 0.32 1% Atropine placebo 68/64